FO. S. COUR ROUSE moeAc. ou H OG
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
aut
Docket No 14
hd Ya
av
17 December 2014
ta i—=
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
s of Title 10, United
naval record pursuant to the provision
tes Code, Section 15
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava
Records, sittir in executive Session, considered your
Lc 2014. The names an f the
©
i Oo
EO
Oo be 0
cr =
Oo
Ss
aa
Wd PLO
uo
ub
1D
Q
(D
3
Ot)
MD
R
ho
=]
@
pi
=
Pp
ho
3
oO
om
f
G
KB
iB
mM
i
dBm @
Oo
Co
G
0
ob
“3
om
@Q,Q Qh
i
members of the t ue
liegatio d
a
0
mM
O
Fh
Kh
5
BK
m @
a
9
ie
i
ct
hr
B
mM
=
(D
5
@
5
(D
4
Fr
(D
=
= 9
} al
—
F
»
we
Ss
OO ct
3
to
ea
br
un
ct
Bhi
w
ct ot oO
ry iH
P
amneooao
mM
proceedings o
the Board consiste
material submitted
applicable statute
Board considered 3
mn
EXLSCENCE
ary 2008, 3 re I poe e
jal ideation, and subsequi , diagnosed with a depressive
P ion-deficient/] etivity disorder
4 ecord further reflects
tions existed prior to
o effectively function
e diagnoses and
d others, you were
authority directed an unchara' ; entry level separa
reason of convenience of the government due to an erroneous
ry 2007, you were so discharged and
istment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to change your reenlistment code so that you may
reenlistment. it aisy considered the documentation regarding
your post service conduct, character reference letters, and
‘medical/clinical documentation provided in support of your
request. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were
not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the
seriousness of your diagnosed depressive disorder, suicidal
ideation, history of drug abuse, and ADHD. Finally, the medical
documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your
depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. With that
being said, again your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
VloN ft
ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Frecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11960 14
BK Qa 20 w f the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your 1 2015. eae a ———— se eee New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11558-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 9) en) 0 ct ty fay =) to Ww CG Oh 4 PR ° Board. OD Oct fe a) K bh Wy HI Q O 5 uw jt M 0 He HO 5 0) 4 ct (D R et 4 Or LQ a ct ie D cat) K = of your oy I i om un ct o a support thereof, your naval recor Pt regulations and policies In addition, the Board con enclosed advisory opinion from Headgq ine Co careful and conscientious consideration of the a 2 Gh . H- B ct ct tn £ K S 2 of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6887 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) THtle 10 U.8
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8123 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Board for Correction of Naval Records of the Navy 2. The Board, consis reviewed Petitioner's 5792 23 March 2015 and, Pf : tt mM f b- yorsp Hw 0 @ or Hs | OM & ct QQ Y Fh cr .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10502 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5676 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Te 100 701 S GOURTHOUSE ROAL. in this regara, is important to keep in mind that a presumption attaches to all official records Consequently Docket No. NR5676-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6761 14
)¢ OR i z = ce Py Oo om Pe Hw YU Q) o 4 w cd Oop GQ i St) ~ 3 uO oO O oO Mm o ow Wi @ o iW Oo 1) Ow 3 wm o i @ oH oa rc Q oO wm @ Yo aoa G fx ag Ww o Ho o,nn oD SG wy 2 Hed & OV Qa Oo HS Qo44 Hi E 1 gm O Youn o oH U Ee “cl wv 1 ~ oH ow “ ou vO rd My oy ed ri} 3. 0Ort > WO © oO G am vo 4 ) + co Up ICel beca law ed as an ea r ena 15 4 provi Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...